{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"LAWP - Studio Legale e Tributario","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.lawp.it\/en\/","title":"Grounds for a judgment that cannot always be appealed against in the Court of Cassation | Studio legale e tributario LAWP","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"eMqvSrqbiK\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.lawp.it\/en\/motivazione-della-sentenza-non-sempre-censurabile-in-cassazione\/\">Grounds for a judgment that cannot always be appealed against in the Court of Cassation<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.lawp.it\/en\/motivazione-della-sentenza-non-sempre-censurabile-in-cassazione\/embed\/#?secret=eMqvSrqbiK\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Grounds for a judgment that cannot always be appealed against in the Court of Cassation&#8221; &#8212; LAWP - Studio Legale e Tributario\" data-secret=\"eMqvSrqbiK\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www.lawp.it\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"With the current wording of art. 360, paragraph 1, no. 5), Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) as a starting point, Dario Augello and Gabriella De Mattia summarised the cases for Eutekne in which the judgement of second instance pronounced by the Regional Tax Commission can be appealed against in the Court of Cassation from the point [&hellip;]"}